A Different Rudy? Not At All, Old Foe Says
By RICHARD STEIER
Posted 7/2/21
In its decision suspending Rudy Giuliani's New York law license for repeatedly making "false and misleading factual statements to cast doubt on the reliability of the results of the 2020 presidential election," a five-judge state Appellate Court panel said of his defense, "He does not attack the constitutionality of the particular disciplinary rules; he seemingly claims that they are unconstitutional as applied to him."
In the wake of that finding, which also rejected Mr. Giuliani's claim that "even if his statements were false or misleading, he did not make the statements knowing they were false when he made them," there were those who, as others have done over the past five years, contended the former Mayor had undergone a radical regression from the person they once respected and admired.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Attention subscribers
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you have an active digital subscription, then you already have an account here. Just reset your password, if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
If you are a current print-only subscriber, and want access to our website,click here to view your options for changing you subscription level.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue
Need an account?
-
Digital subscribers
If you're a digital subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.
-
Print-only subscribers
If you're a print-only subscriber, click here to view options for changing your subscription level.
-
Non-subscribers
Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.
-
Register to post an event, or comment
Click here create a free account for posting comments.
|