The Professional Staff Congress is suing the City University of New York claiming it should not have effectively laid off 2,800 adjunct instructors at a time when it stands to receive $251 million in Federal funding under an early stimulus bill that requires using some of the money to keep workers on the payroll.
There is an added, arguably more-disturbing element to how the "non-reappointments" were implemented. It appears hundreds, if not thousands, of those not asked back for the fall semester were veteran adjuncts who had become eligible for three-year appointments under the PSC's most-recent contract with CUNY.
Is it legal for the system to get rid of a significant number of instructors just as they were becoming eligible for a limited form of job security? We won't know unless the PSC files an improper labor practice charge.
But from a moral standpoint, is this how you're supposed to treat more-experienced workers even in a time of crisis? What exactly does it say to students that CUNY appears to be borrowing from the playbook of corporations saving a few bucks by getting rid of employees deemed interchangeable, even if those paying the price have experience that should be an asset to their employers.

We depend on the support of readers like you to help keep our publication strong and independent. Join us.


(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.