Two weeks after it was signed into law by Mayor de Blasio, legislation intended to curb the use of violent police conduct continued to draw scrutiny—and also some pushback from the very people responsible for the possible prosecution of officers who run afoul of its provisions.
At issue is the so-called diaphragm bill’s apparent ambiguity and, critically, its constitutionality.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you have an active digital subscription, then you already have an account here. Just reset your password, if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
If you are a current print-only subscriber, and want access to our website,click here to view your options for changing you subscription level.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
