To the Editor: Over the week of March 9, it became increasingly clear that schools needed to close in New York City. Schools were already closed or closing in many states, and Greater New York, as the most densely populated metropolitan area in the country, was at a higher risk of rapid spread than anywhere else.

By the end of the week, the UFT leadership began its 'fight': vowing to file a labor complaint, considering a lawsuit against the DOE, and eventually claiming it would file an injunction with the Supreme Court (as if it would care more than De Blasio).

Meanwhile, rank-and-file UFT members were organizing to protect themselves and their students. Job actions such as sickouts, walk-ins, and walkouts were discussed and planned in many union chapters across the city. De facto sick-outs among educators and families alike were already happening for the entire week prior, and it was obvious the time to shut the schools had already passed.

At this point, UFT leadership and rank-and-file members agreed on the problem, but not the solution.

On Sunday March 15, facing rock-bottom student and Teacher attendance the next day, Mayor De Blasio finally closed the schools. 

Nevertheless, from March 17-19, public educators were told to report to school in order to transition to remote learning for the foreseeable future. Why was it necessary to ask educators to travel across the city to meet physically to learn how to teach remotely? Two months later, over 100 educators have died, 16 percent of students still do not have access to remote learning, and about 50 percent overall do not actively participate. 

Now, the UFT doesn't have the backs of its members. In April, almost 300 rank-and-file members filed grievances against DOE administration, citing violations of contractual provisions related to health and safety. The grievants wanted paid sick days added for all members, including those who stayed home in order to protect themselves.

Instead of fighting for these members' rights, UFT district representatives repeatedly told them that grievances could not be filed. However, no written agreement between the UFT and DOE stipulates this. Further, there is a statute of limitations for filing grievances; if the DOE has not agreed to waive these limitations, the DOE could reject the grievances, as the time for filing those has already expired. Rather, the UFT was refusing to pursue these grievances, and by extension refusing to fight for the dignity of members who were put in harm's way in March.

Immediately, the UFT needs to do the following:

  • file all grievances for teachers remotely;
  • negotiate a strong contract for online learning similar to that of the United Teachers of Los Angeles;
  • establish a specific and thorough safety plan for re-opening schools;
  • prepare the rank and file for potential work actions in the fall, through political education and reorganization of the union.
  • The time to show resolve and strength is now. 






Rank-and-file members of the United Federation of Teachers

We depend on the support of readers like you to help keep our publication strong and independent. Join us.


(1) comment


It’s not only the UFT it’s a number of different unions In particular DC37 and it’s treasurer who is also president of local 1407. I’m a retiree from another labor union and hav been fighting for members rights while a representative in my local. and hav supported my partner as a Union member in her local with her own related grievance. The local was resistant on filing her grievance for 8 months. We will keep up the fight for justice. It’s all about LEADERS who don’t care to lead!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.