To the Editor: The Chief’s Jan 17, 2020 story regarding TWU Local 100’s recently concluded contract ratification incorrectly identifies both the name and potential beneficiaries of an employee availability clause contained within the Memorandum of Understanding voted on. The referenced clause is part of Attachment A, which is titled Employee Availability, not Productivity, and the potential beneficiaries of the new gainsharing scheme are the MTA and the UNION, not the members.
The misnomer of the clause is largely inconsequential, but the implications of having the employees being displaced by the union as a gainsharing beneficiary are not.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you have an active digital subscription, then you already have an account here. Just reset your password, if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
If you are a current print-only subscriber, and want access to our website,click here to view your options for changing you subscription level.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
