Sponsors of the "Less is More" law, which will take effect in March, argued that too many of those released on parole were having it revoked for minor violations, including missing meetings with their Parole Officers.
 
Do they have a point that missing one meeting shouldn't be enough to send the parolee back to prison? Yes. But allow it to happen too often and it causes two problems: it devalues the work that Parole Officers do, and is a sign that there are problems in the parolee's life that could mean he or she is on the road to recidivism.
 
At a recent union rally, one veteran Parole Officer said the law "actually rewards" rulebreakers. She's right. The law should be tweaked so that missing one meeting, or even two, isn't enough to "violate" them, but a third no-show is.

We depend on the support of readers like you to help keep our publication strong and independent. Join us.

0
0
0
0
0

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.