MLC rally

FIGHTING ON TWO FRONTS: Even as municipal unions continued to press the case in Albany to either increase the city's borrowing authority or approve legislation providing an early-retirement incentive as alternatives to layoffs, hundreds of workers rallied in Foley Square Sept. 3 to make the case that essential workers should not be discarded to close a budget hole.

Two days after he held off on sending 30-day layoff notices to 22,000 city workers, Mayor de Blasio said he needed concrete quickly the State Legislature was coming back into session to let the city borrow $5 billion or pink slips would soon be issued.

He warned that if there wasn't a speedy disposition in the city's favor it was likely there would be "even more layoffs."

Waiting the Hardest Part

"We're waiting for a resolution of that," Mr. de Blasio told reporters at his Sept. 2 briefing. "And if it's a positive resolution and Albany declares that they're coming back to address this issue, we'll continue to hold off on layoffs. And if it turns out that we can't get such a declaration from Albany, unfortunately we will have to move ahead with the notices."

He continued, "The longer a delay goes, it means either you get the borrowing to stop layoffs, or God forbid you don't get the borrowing...Again, a few days, either way, not decisive. But if you start talking about weeks and you don't get the borrowing? Unfortunately, tragically for this city, it means even more layoffs."

For months, the Mayor has said he needed $1 billion in concessions from city unions, aid from Washington, or additional borrowing capacity from Albany to cover the city's $9-billion budget gap.

On Aug. 24, the Municipal Labor Committee wrote the Mayor asking that he hold off for 30 days on the layoff notices scheduled to go out Sept. 1 to give the unions more time to make the city's case in Albany.

Speaker Backs Plan

Late last month, Mr. de Blasio's borrowing proposal gained some momentum when City Council Speaker Cory Johnson announced, "I think that New York City deserves the authority to borrow funds to meet our immediate needs given the impact of COVID-19 on our revenue." 

But there appears to be no clear consensus in Albany of how to address the state and city fiscal crises.

City & State reported that State Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins and Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie were "also feeling more pressure to immediately reconvene their chambers to approve new taxes on the wealthy."

The website cited progressive lawmakers—including State Sens. Jessica Ramos, Julia Salazar and new Assembly Members Zohran Mamdani, Marcela Mitaynes and Emily Gallagher—who were all "pushing to "raise billions in new revenue to overcome the multi-billion-dollar state budget deficit caused by the pandemic."

"While many of us in our communities have been suffering tremendously throughout this pandemic, the very wealthy have been doing just fine," Ms. Salazar said during a virtual press conference, according to City & State. "This is the most important thing that we could be fighting for in New York right now."

'An Unprecedented Threat'

"Layoffs on this scale are an unprecedented threat to workers, their families, and the City economy," longtime Assembly Member Richard Gottfried wrote in an email. "This is a big part of why the Legislature needs to come back into session and raise major revenue by taxing high wealth."

But there were dissenters as well. "De Blasio's fear-mongering with threatened layoffs is yet another example of his failed administration, pandemic or no," wrote Sen. John C. Liu in response to a query from this newspaper. "The plain truth is that layoffs are avoidable even without incurring additional debt. De Blasio wants permission to borrow $5 billion mainly because he is incapable of making choices."

He continued, "Nonetheless, I and many fellow legislators do not want dedicated city workers to suffer the brunt of de Blasio's incompetence, which in turn hurts our constituents. Now that the City Council has dropped their opposition to city borrowing, I think there is enough support among state lawmakers to grant the borrowing authority."

Union leaders said the "up in the air" status of the city's fiscal situation was taking a serious toll on their rank and files.

Joe Puleo, president of District Council 37 Local 983, which represents 3,000 blue-collar workers in a variety of titles, said the one constructive development during the crisis was an increased willingness by his members to get involved, including traveling to Albany to advance the union's agenda.

Layoffs a Betrayal

"It used to be like pulling teeth to go up to Albany," Mr. Puleo said. "But, because they unselfishly worked through the pandemic, when everyone else was told to stay home, they take pride in the fact they are essential workers who kept the city safe. Now, they feel betrayed in the worst way to find out they could be laid off."

"Believe it or not we have FDNY EMTs who were just kids when 9/11 happened who moved from places like Kansas to work for the city for what they thought was their dream job," said Oren Barzilay, president of DC 37 Local 2507, which represents Emergency Medical Technicians and Fire Inspectors. "Now with talk of these layoffs, we are shattering their dreams. It was bad enough they had to worry about their low pay. Now they have to sweat out no pay."

Senate Majority spokesman Mike Murphy said "we are willing to work with New York City to identify the best course forward without hurting working men and women and at the same time pursuing a fiscally responsible course."

Brooklyn Sen. Andrew Gounardes. who chairs the Committee on Civil Service and Pensions, was more caustic, saying it was "flat-out repugnant for the Mayor to continue to hold the livelihoods of 22,000 public servants hostage while he continues to dole out hefty raises to political appointees.

A spokesman for Mr. Heastie said he was "in favor of letting the city have the flexibility it needs so it can deliver essential services and avoid laying off employees in the middle of the pandemic."

Precedent for Albany Aid

Mr. de Blasio told reporters that there was a precedent Albany granting the city more borrowing capacity in the aftermath of the World Trade Center attacks.

"The fact is, and we have a great example," he said, "the City of New York went to Albany right after 9/11, got $2.5 billion in borrowing authority. Long-term borrowing, 20-year plan, only ended up using $2 billion of that authority. So, granting us the ability gives us the ability to manage an ever-changing situation. But our clear purpose here is only to borrow that which we need, not a single dollar more."

But unlike 9/11, the city's problem is just part of a nationwide financial meltdown where cities, counties and states are awash in red ink due to COVID-19 and the public-health measures imposed to slow its spread.


We depend on the support of readers like you to help keep our publication strong and independent. Join us.

2
1
2
1
3

(12) comments

BamBam

15 thousand provisional and temp employees some making 6 figures and they want to go after permanent civil service titles?

Kellis830

Usually, they way it’s works is provisional employees are the first groups to go when layoffs occur. It’s within the city bylaws. Layoffs occur in inverse order (provided they don’t through in emergency) which is last in, first out. This is usually don’t after provisionals.

KXNT_KGO

Don't forget non-union employees and executive leadership in the Mayor's Office, City Hall, and city agencies. ThriveNYC is another source to realize significant savings by shutting it down.

KXNT_KGO

Why is the City not focusing on managerial employees? These managerial employees should be looked at for workforce reductions. The Unions need to call out the Mayor as his administration is no longer a friend to organized labor. 30-day layoff notices are not required for managerial employees. What makes managers so special that their ranks should not be reduced?

bcam

Exactly!!!👍[thumbup][thumbup]

BamBam

yes

krell1349

Not only managerial employees, but consultants. A retirement incentive would be the right way to do this.

stuarteber

Most managers are civil servants who have earned the same rights as non-managerial employees. If these managers are the “first to go”, they will bump union members with less seniority in their fall back titles. The emphasis should b3 on buyouts, borrowing and other productive cost saving measures, not on layoffs for younger employees.

bcam

City should consider lowering the age and years for early retirements ex: 20 year's of service, age 52 year's old, & older at full rate, due to special circumstances.

CITYREBEL

Why the hate on managers? Managers are people with families too! And many ARE civil servants. LONGTIME civil servants. They take promotional tests and their previous titles were typically PAA. Also, they often get the greater workload and responsibilities. They also do not get OT or compensatory time.

The City can start by laying off provisional employees and implementing an early incentive retirement. The City can also save money by eliminating all the special Mayoral Offices. Take a look at how many there are. Almost all have highly paid Mayoral Office Assistants in addition to commissioners and deputies. But I've been on the City workforce many years and you can't tell me that there isn't any waste that can't be cut. For every 10 dedicated, hardworking civil servants, there is at least one non-productive employee that can be laid off with no consequences to the efficiency of the operation of the office. You know who I'm talking about. Every office has one or two employees doing close to nothing and yet they get their raises just like everyone else.

KXNT_KGO

Executives (including managerial employees who are not represented by a union) should be reduced. The focus should be on protecting titles that are represented by collective bargaining.

Kellis830

@cityrebel, I couldn’t have said it better myself. There has been a lot going on within these past 7/8 years. I was an employee when Bloomberg was in office. Either way there are going to be some decisions made and that’s the sad part of it all. I’m sure there are ways to reduce...lots of other ways.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.