I’ve been very disappointed in your very slanted reporting and editorials the last six years referring to the Vulcan/Department of Justice/FDNY litigation and resulting remedial actions.
In your most recent editorial (June 1 issue) you suggest all the suspicious smoking chatter of non-minority candidates concerning the delay in results of the FDNY test is so, so unwarranted. Maybe their concerns are based on the factual history of FDNY hiring in the last five years under the collective direction of the judge, his appointed monitor, the Vulcans and of course the self-serving FDNY administration agenda of appeasement.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you have an active digital subscription, then you already have an account here. Just reset your password, if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
If you are a current print-only subscriber, and want access to our website,click here to view your options for changing you subscription level.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |