The first contested election in 12 years for Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association president concludes this week, and one of the most-remarkable aspects of it is the lack of focus from any of the participants on what Len Levitt in his blog two weeks ago called the “most-notable accomplishment” of Pat Lynch’s 16-year tenure: “bringing the union into the 21st century largely corruption-free.”
It’s easy to understand why Mr. Lynch’s camp has refrained from raising the corruption issue in connection with the charges of ticket-fixing leveled against three candidates on main challenger Brian Fusco’s slate, including Mr. Fusco himself. For one thing, the union officials who have been charged are widely believed to have been performing this duty as part of their PBA portfolios; for another, there is apparently a sense among many cops that they were doing so with the tacit encouragement of people high up in the NYPD chain of command, as well as the union’s leadership.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you have an active digital subscription, then you already have an account here. Just reset your password, if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
If you are a current print-only subscriber, and want access to our website,click here to view your options for changing you subscription level.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |