With a bit more than a third of the ballots counted on Election Night, Andrew Cuomo had 70 percent of the vote to 26 percent for his Republican opponent, Marc Molinaro, and it seemed possible that he was on his way to such an overwhelming win that, deserved or not, he would be thrust into the front of the pack seeking the Democratic nomination for President in 2020.
But then what might be called the Paladino Principle asserted itself. Carl Paladino, the GOP nominee against Mr. Cuomo in 2010, established benchmarks for uncouth behavior and questionable associations that have faded from memory only because Donald Trump has since redefined the standards for New York politicians, yet he still got 33.5 percent of the vote to the Democrat’s 63 percent.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you have an active digital subscription, then you already have an account here. Just reset your password, if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
If you are a current print-only subscriber, and want access to our website,click here to view your options for changing you subscription level.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |