In his closing argument on behalf of Police Officer Daniel Pantaleo last week, defense attorney Stu London contended that Eric Garner was killed not by an NYPD-banned chokehold applied by his client but rather several serious physical ailments from which he suffered that made him particularly vulnerable to stress and strenuous physical struggle.

In essence, he said, Mr. Garner set in motion his own demise by resisting arrest when Officer Pantaleo tried to handcuff him for selling untaxed cigarettes on a Staten Island street.

His remarks about Mr. Garner are valid; it was poor judgment to resist given his physical condition. But the dead man was someone whose own wife acknowledged, with affection, that he could be irresponsible.

That doesn’t exonerate Officer Pantaleo, a veteran cop whose training should have given him better judgment in a tense situation than a street guy who was chronically in trouble. At the time he tried to cuff Mr. Garner, the suspect was engaged in a loud but civil argument with the officer’s partner. Particularly given the petty nature of the alleged crime, there was no urgency to cuffing Mr. Garner rather than letting him vent.

That reality should loom large in deciding Officer Pantaleo’s fate.

We depend on the support of readers like you to help keep our publication strong and independent. Join us.


(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.