Log in Subscribe

Life Insurance a Poor Substitute for Pension

By JOEL FRANK
Posted 8/18/15

Participants in the nation’s defined-benefit pension system (public and private) are being preyed upon by life-insurance salespeople. One par­ticularly hurtful proposal dispensed by the commission salesperson is for the pension member to elect the maximum pension (no option) and purchase a life-insurance policy for the protection of the significant other. Upon the death of the insured, the significant other will invest the death proceeds in stocks and bonds in such a way as to generate substantially the same income stream as would be had if the pensioner elected the equal-to-survivor option from the pension system. This proposal is referred to as Pension Maximization.

Let’s examine Joe and Joanne’s situation: Joe is a member of the uniformed forces of the City of New York and is married to Joanne. Both will be 55 when Joe retires. His maximum pension will be $50,000 annually. After thoughtful consideration, they have decided that they need to plan for Joanne’s financial security should she survive Joe.

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in