Two New Jersey Teachers report the same salary history. Their first year they earned $30,000 with annual increases of 3 percent. Ten percent of their salary was contributed to their 403(b) account. The contributions generated an 8-percent return.
After 40 years, Teacher A has an account value of $700,000, while Teacher B has an account value of $1.1 million.
Q.: Why the massive difference?
A.: Teacher A paid the 403(b) brokers about 2.2 percent in unwarranted fees and commissions, while Teacher B contributed to the zero-cost state-administered 403(b) plan known as the New Jersey Supplemental Annuity Collective Trust (SACT).
With that said, why does the SACT manage roughly $250 million while the 403(b) brokers manage about $25 billion?
Where’s The Menu?
The SACT began operations in 1963 and has yet to adopt an investment-choice menu. Teacher contributions are arbitrarily invested in a common-stock portfolio managed by the New Jersey Division of Investment. There are no investment choices.
The absence of an investment-choice menu is a clear violation of the Fiduciary Standard, 403(b) brokers have been very busy, since 1963, selling their commission-based investment menus to New Jersey teachers.
Nationally, complaints against 403(b) plans are for alleged excessive fees and commissions; not for lack of investment choices.
Mr. Frank is a fee-only Retirement Financial Planner and a retired city high school Teacher of Accounting. He can be reached by phone at (732) 536-9472, or via email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
We depend on the support of readers like you to help keep our publication strong and independent. Join us.