The Federal Judge overseeing the stop-and-frisk litigation last week welcomed efforts by two police unions to participate in the reform process, but not on the timetable they had sought.
The March 19 decision by U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres deals with a Federal Monitor appointed by the previous Judge on the case, Shira A. Scheindlin, to work out changes in procedures, supervision, reporting, training and discipline involving the department’s stop-and-frisk policies.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you have an active digital subscription, then you already have an account here. Just reset your password, if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
If you are a current print-only subscriber, and want access to our website,click here to view your options for changing you subscription level.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
