Plaintiffs in the stop-and-frisk litigation who won an order that the NYPD overhaul its procedures on the controversial tactic have warned against a confidentiality rule proposed by the Federal Monitor coordinating the overhaul, the New York Law Journal reported last week.
The monitor, Peter Zimroth, submitted a draft order in July that would allow confidential information to be disclosed to the public in his regular reports. But the order would prohibit the release of confidential information he did not report to interested parties such as police-reform advocates, the newspaper said Sept. 4.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you have an active digital subscription, then you already have an account here. Just reset your password, if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
If you are a current print-only subscriber, and want access to our website,click here to view your options for changing you subscription level.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
